A company relationship is not a lead.
The same movement can matter to a seller, an investor, a strategist and nobody at all. Signal comes before interpretation.
It is easy to look at company-to-company activity and immediately translate it into sales language. Company A is talking to Company B, therefore Company B is a lead. That is sometimes true. It is also an unnecessarily narrow interpretation.
Inter-company work can represent a vendor evaluation, a customer escalation, a partnership, an implementation, a legal process, a financing relationship, a channel motion or a strategic project that fits none of those categories.
The observation and the interpretation are different layers.
Evericade's job is to make the observation reliable: a relationship exists, activity changed, the change is unusual, the change persisted. A user's job is to decide whether that matters in the context of the decision they are making.
This distinction matters commercially too. The same underlying signal can be useful to a revenue team trying to understand account motion, an investor watching a portfolio, or a strategy team monitoring an ecosystem.
Trying to force every relationship into a single workflow too early makes the signal less general and often less honest.
A relationship is not a lead. It is evidence that organisations are doing work together. What that work means is the next question.